Allowable costs are set forth by the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). To qualify as allowable, a cost must meet the following criteria as outlined in FAR 31.201-2,3,4:
DCAA gives detailed descriptions of the guidelines, parameters, and supports of each item listed above. Therefore, a government contractor needs to view the details to gain a comprehensive understanding of how to properly interpret and apply the criteria when accounting for allowable reimbursements.
Allowable costs with specified restrictions include:
Compensation for Personal Services |
FAR 31.205-6 |
Depreciation of Facilities and Equipment |
FAR 31.205-11 |
Independent Research & Development or Bid & Proposal Costs |
FAR 31.205-18 |
Travel Costs |
FAR 31.205-46 |
Rental Costs |
FAR 31.205-36 |
Selling Costs | FAR 31.205-38 |
Trade, Business, Technical, and Professional Activity Costs | FAR 31.205-43 |
Contractors must account for all costs with accurate, updated records and supporting documentation. Any missing data could constitute a dismissal of a claimed cost. Contractors need to understand what that means according to the FAR and not by their own understanding.
Reasonable is defined by the FAR as a cost that does not exceed what a prudent contractor would incur as they conduct day-to-day business. Translation: The contractor should not presume that any cost is reasonable. Instead, the owner or manager should scrutinize the cost under a heavy burden of proof. This is precisely the approach that the contracting officer will take when reviewing an itemized list.
The cost must be ordinary and necessary to conduct business. Assigning the cost as allowable must be a generally accepted sound practice that meets all Federal and State laws and regulations, allows the contractor to fulfill their business responsibilities to all stakeholders, and shows no significant deviation to the contractor’s established practice.
A cost is Allocable to a government contract if the contractor incurs it specifically for the contract, benefits the contract and all related work, and is necessary to business operations. The contractor must demonstrate that the cost is equitable to the business relationship.
Any cost that does not meet all five criteria (reasonable, allocable, CAS, contract terms, FAR subpart limitations) is dismissed as an unallowable cost as outlined in FAR 31.205. This section of FAR is broken into categories, each containing an extensive list of unallowable costs, terms and conditions, and specified applications of each cost.
Contractors must establish separate accounts for each category and exclude federal government contracts when submitting reimbursements. Unallowable categories include (under specified terms and conditions):
Alcoholic Beverages |
FAR 31.205-51 |
Bad Debts |
FAR 31.205-3 |
Contributions or Donations |
FAR 31.205-8 |
Interest and Other Financial Costs |
FAR 31.205-20 |
Entertainment Costs, Amusement, or Social Activities |
FAR 31.205-14 |
Goodwill Stemming from Amortization, Write-offs, Company Acquisition |
FAR 31.205-49 |
Executive Lobbying Costs |
FAR 31.205-50 |
Loss on Other Contracts |
FAR 31.205-23 |
Organization Costs |
FAR 31.205-27 |
Companies may enter into a contract that involves multiple government agencies. Working with more than one agency can lead to either DCAA conflicts between agencies or variances in how the reimbursement allowances are interpreted and applied. For example, the Department of Energy (DoE) does not allow patent prosecution costs unless specifically authorized. Likewise, Health and Human Services (HHS) does not accept reimbursement claims for costs associated with research and development.
To complicate the matter worse, there are few resources available to business contractors that explain DCAA regulations in a way that can be universally understood or applied. Even the wording within FAR is vague enough that contractors can often find themselves wading in regulatory penalties and fees or without plausible explanation as to why certain costs were written off as unallowable.
An example of this is FAR 31.001 that defines expressly unallowable cost as:
“...a particular item or type of cost which, under the express provisions of an applicable law, regulation, or contract, is specifically named and stated to be unallowable."
The problem with this wording is that it doesn’t account for costs that can be inferred as expressly unallowable even if FAR doesn’t express them in direct terms.
One way companies can properly interpret and apply DCAA unallowable costs is to view and clarify the contract terms between the company and the governing agency. The terms of the contract may outline in detail costs that are allowable. Contractors need to thoroughly examine both their prime and subcontracts so that they have a clear understanding of allowable and unallowable reimbursements included in the contract.
There are proactive steps that contractors can take to mitigate the risk of improperly classifying allowable and unallowable costs such as:
If your company is looking for a viable digital solution to your accounting and DCAA-compliance needs, then you should consider SYMPAQ. We design cost accounting software for government contractors with a focus on providing an enhanced user experience, a clear and well-organized interface, along with abundant features.
To find out more about our products and service or to schedule a consultation, contact us today at
1-800-437-8151. You can also send a message on our contact page.